Reply to Hickey et al.
نویسنده
چکیده
We thank Hickey et al. [1] for their insightful comments with regard to our validation study on EuroSCORE II [2]. With regard to the era of patients, a time bias almost certainly does exist. This is a limitation of many retrospective singleinstitution validation studies, as most units do not have the number, and thus the statistical power, to use a small reference time period. It has already been suggested that a seasonal bias may exist in the EuroSCORE II model, making interpretation/validation even more difficult [3]. Validation with a time period similar to the data accrual of the EuroSCORE II project would require the use of a national dataset. In the UK, this is possible, but the data are 3–4 years out of date by the time it has been collected and checked for completeness, but not validated. With regard to the modified EuroSCORE, this was only included as it is of interest to readers from the UK. This model has not been widely adopted and was used mainly by the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery (SCTS) in Great Britain and Ireland, hence the limited comment in our article [2]. Discrepancy frequently arises between single institutions and national results, as pointed out by Hickey et al. The UK mortality for isolated aortic valve replacement is 3.1%, with a predicted EuroSCORE II of 3.4% [4]. Our institution has a mortality of 2.3%, with a EuroSCORE II predicted of 6.9% (this does not include transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients). These differences may partially explain the lack of correlation between national and intuitional data with regard to the calibration and discrimination of the EuroSCORE original or II risk models. With regard to procedure-specific models, as already occurs with the Southern Thoracic Society risk models, we agree that this is probably a superior solution to the ‘one model fits all’, however, it should be pointed out that multiple logistic regression is a linear modelling technique, but the data are non-linear [5]. We thank Hickey et al. for their comments.
منابع مشابه
Reply to “A Critical Review of Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis”
Proximal fibular osteotomy is a surgical procedure that has evoked significant interest and controversy in the recent past. Vaishya et al have made a significant effort in compiling the available evidence on the topic. However, we would like to make some significant suggestions and additions to the findings in their manuscript.
متن کاملEnvironmental gamma radiation: a comment (Letter to the Editor)
Editor, I read the recent publication by Toossi et al. with a great interest (1). Toossi et al. concluded that “Average gonad and bone marrow doses for North Khorasan, Boshehr and Hormozgan provinces were less than the corresponding values for normal area (2).” There are some facts on this report to be concerned. I agree that the detected levels might be high in the mentioned area, but th...
متن کاملThe asymmetric leaves2 (as2) mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana generated leaf lobes and leaflet-like structures from the petioles of leaves in a bilaterally asymmetric manner. Both the delayed formation of the primary vein and the asymmetric formation of secondary veins
The left-right symmetry of most living things has been of general interest not only to biologists but also to researchers in other fields. In contrast to animals that have developed bodies with left-right symmetry, which is believed to be tightly linked to the capacity for mobility, plants are basically immovable and their overall body shapes exhibit conic symmetry (Gardner, 1990). It is, nonet...
متن کاملLetter to editor
Dear Prof. Mozdarani,I would like to discuss about some important aspects regarding the article published in, "Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012 10(2): 89-94“ with title of “Patient doses from X-ray computed tomography examinations by a single-array detector unit: Axial versus spiral mode" by Ghavami et al. (1), so according to journal policy and in suitable manner please ask the authors to rep...
متن کاملOn Words, Tests, and Applications: Reply to Faith et al
Faith et al. (2003) strongly criticize our paper (Posadas et al. 2001). Their criticisms are based on what they consider our “ill definitions” and “erroneous applications” of the words complementarity, endemism, and biodiversity. The objectives of our reply to Faith et al. are to demonstrate that their criticisms do not satisfy epistemological and methodological tenets and to compare some aspec...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
دوره 43 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013